SAN JOSE — City officials Friday announced tentative settlements on Measure B pension reforms with eight unions, bringing San Jose closer to replacing the controversial measure voters approved in 2012 that slowed the growth in retirement costs but launched a lengthy legal battle and employee exodus.
All but one of the city’s 11 employee unions have signed a proposed settlement to drop Measure B lawsuits and accept a negotiated compromise on their retirement benefits.
The newest agreement, which covers about 99 percent of San Jose employees, is with eight of the city’s nine unions not related to public safety — from engineers to attorneys — representing nearly 4,000 workers. The city reached a similar deal with police and fire unions last summer.
“We’re turning the page on a difficult and divisive period of San Jose’s past,” said Mayor Sam Liccardo.
Measure B, which was overwhelmingly approved by voters, reduced pension benefits for new hires, required existing workers to pay more for their retirement and eliminated a costly retiree perk. The measure’s architect, former Mayor Chuck Reed, said San Jose faced a do-or-die situation — leaders could either reel in skyrocketing retirement costs or lay off employees amid multimillion-dollar budget deficits.
But unions filed numerous lawsuits, saying the measure was an assault on their “vested rights,” and blamed it for chasing away hundreds of police officers and other city employees.
A Santa Clara County judge blocked the provision that would have made workers pay more for their pensions, citing state court precedents that have shielded government workers from pension plan cutbacks. Surviving parts of the measure were saving San Jose about $25 million a year while both sides eyed appeals.
Reed wanted the city to continue fighting the pension battle.
“I’d like to have the California Supreme Court have a chance to tell us what the rules really are for what are considered vested retirement benefits in California,” Reed said Friday.
But Liccardo, a Reed ally who had backed the measure and campaigned to defend it, opened the door to settlement talks after taking office.
The agreement announced Friday upholds parts of Measure B while abandoning others. It maintains the elimination of retiree bonus checks — offering $390 million savings over 30 years. And it brings new hires into a new, scaled-back retirement benefits plan, though one more generous than Measure B permitted and more in line with changes in state plans adopted after the measure passed. Employees hired before Measure B’s passage retain their existing benefits and won’t have to make higher contributions.
City leaders say the agreement will save nearly $3 billion over the next 30 years. Vice Mayor Rose Herrera said it puts the city “on the path to restoration of city services.”
The only union that refused to sign the deal is the Association of Building, Mechanical and Electrical Inspectors, which represents nearly 80 workers.
“We have a number of issues with it,” said the union’s president, Peter Fenerin. “If you’re going to constantly kick people, you can’t expect them to sign away their rights and benefits. It’s a complete loss and deterioration of benefits.”
Fenerin said the agreement means new hires pay more for benefits and must wait longer to retire than co-workers covered under the old plan, creating divisiveness among employees.
City Manager Norberto Dueñas said he’s hopeful ABMEI will get on board.
“I’ve always felt that there isn’t anything we cannot accomplish by just coming together and working our issues out in a respectful manner,” Dueñas said.
Even without one union, with agreements in hand for the other 10 representing some 5,000 city employees, San Jose will go to a judge and ask that Measure B be invalidated. The city will then replace the measure with ordinances to implement the terms of the settlement agreement.
It also will pay $1.3 million in attorneys fees to the non-public-safety unions.
The agreement also must be ratified by the union membership and approved by the City Council, which is scheduled to consider it on Dec. 15.
County Assessor Larry Stone, a supporter of Liccardo and Measure B, said that while “the methodology of Measure B was wrong,” Liccardo shouldn’t turn his back on pension reform, given the city’s still-massive costs.
“I would be very disappointed if Sam didn’t continue to fight for pension reform,” Stone said. “I think he needs to keep trying to do major reform to the system.”
Follow Ramona Giwargis at Twitter.com/ramonagiwargis, or contact her at 408-920-5705.
the proposed measure b deal
For new hires and those hired after Measure B’s passage in 2012
